Fulford battlefied under threat

Find us

Legal questions

Latest media release

Home
Up
The Editor YEP   18 February 2008    Dear Sir  Thank you for the excellent photograph and article about the flooding along Ge...
Inquiry result
Dept for Communities and local Government
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Secretary of State
The Public Inquiry
Appeal statement
English Heritage
Press letter
Council letter
Access to info
Initial objection
Access to documents
Traffic study
Planning Officer
Developer letters
Objections
Peer review
Proposed mitigation
Legal questions
Access for research
Impass
Credibility

All History Guide: Your guide to history on the Internet..

 

 

Now in paperback

Legal questions, anomalies and contentions at Fulford

Related to the proposed Germany Beck development

Is there any redress against inaccuracies in the planning submissions?
Can inconvenient papers, withdrawn by the developer, be considered?
Do developers owe a duty of care to the law or community?
Are the COYC responsible for the accuracy when checking any claims? If not, who is responsible?
Why is it not possible to demand access to the flooding and traffic calculations under the freedom of information provisions?
Can denial of access for research be legally portrayed as proof of absence? (Logically, absence of proof is not proof of absence)
What conditions must be fulfilled before matters can be referred to the minister?

Home Search Contents Feedback Books Threat to the site

Site provided by Xhost

Keep me updated

© C Jones 2001-8
The site was updated  24 February 2008