Legal questions, anomalies and contentions at Fulford

Related to the proposed Germany Beck development

• Is there any redress against inaccuracies in the planning submissions?
• Can inconvenient papers, withdrawn by the developer, be considered?
• Do developers owe a duty of care to the law or community?
• Are the COYC responsible for the accuracy when checking any claims? If not, who is responsible?
• Why is it not possible to demand access to the flooding and traffic calculations under the freedom of information provisions?
• Can denial of access for research be legally portrayed as proof of absence? (Logically, absence of proof is not proof of absence)
• What conditions must be fulfilled before matters can be referred to the minister?